The non-impact origin of the Libyan Desert Glass (LDG)

March 2006
Norbert Brügge, Germany
Dipl.-Geol.

last update: 29.06.2010


The strewn field of the Libyan Desert Glass (LDG) is located in the Western Desert of Egypt nearby the Libyan border (part of the Great Sand Sea). The area is occupies with high parallel sand dunes, which extend from north to south direction more as hundred kilometers in length. As centre is assumed an area, which is expands about 20 km from W to E and about 50 km from N to S around the position at 25° 25' N and 25° 30' E. The occurrence of silica-glass was documented for the first time by Patrick A. Clayton in 1932.
It is supposed, that on a plain of about 6500 km2 a mass of ~1400 tons of LDG is distributed. The most productive locations therefore are directly in the north of Gilf Kebir plateau.

The Libyan Desert Glass (LDG) is in its chemical and physical characteristics absolutely single and with no other natural glass comparable (volcanic glass, Tektites and impact glass). Nevertheless should be evidences for an impact origin the presence of schlieren and partly digested mineral phases, and Lechatelierite (a high-temperature mineral melts of Quartz, however at slight pressure), and Baddeleyite, a high-temperature breakdown product of Zircon (STORZER & KOEBERL,1991). But the so characteristic inclusions of small crystals of Tridymite and Cristobalite are missing in impact glasses. Also typical for tektite are spherical or drops - formed aerodynamic forms.
There are however also differences between the LDG and the "classical" impact glasses, mainly by the chemistry (KOEBERL,1994). LDG is a very silica-rich natural glass with about 95.5 - 99 wt.% SiO2, and shows a limited variation in major and trace element abundances. To mention are Al2O3, MgO, Na2O, K2O, CaO, FeO and TiO2. All other elements (e.g. the group of the rare earth elements) occur only as trace. The degree of hardness (MOHS) is 6, the specific weight is 2.2 g/cm3, the refractive index is 1.46.
The viscosity is essentially greater than at tektites. The melting point is with 1713° C more as 500° higher, than which other natural glasses. The Desert Glass differs from the Tektites also by higher capacity of water inclusions (0.050 - 0.200 wt.%). The colours of the LDG's varies from light-yellow, honey-yellow, green-yellow, milky-white to black-grey.


At the surface deposited fragments are polished often by the wind erosion, in sediment sticking fragments have sharp corners, are not gleaming, and sand grains are stuck. In macroscopic examination, the glass shows no impact tracks (JUX,1983), in some fragments are however schlieren, which point to internal movements in the material at high temperatures.Tiny, irregularly formed bubbles, and light- and dark-brown bands can enforce the homogeneous glassy mass. Is the concentration of bubbles high, the Desert Glass appears milky - white and is opaque. Beside the bubbles different kinds of further inclusions are to be recognized. To this (e.g.) belong smallest crystal - grains of Quartz similar minerals Tridymite and Cristobalite.
 

Cristobalite and Tridymite have high and low forms. Low Tridymite is orthorhombic and pseudohexagonal, low Cristobalite is tetragonal and pseudo-cubic.
The equilibrium formation temperature of Cristobalite is 1470°C. The equilibrium formation temperature of  Tridymite is 870°C.


A Cristobalite aggregat in LDG


MURALI et al. 1997; ROCCHIA et al. 1996; KOEBERL 1997 have found that the contents of siderophile elements, such as Co, Ni and Ir, are significantly enriched in some rare, dark bands that occur in some LDG samples. KOEBERL (1997) studied such dark bands and found that the contents of Fe, Mg, and Ni are high in the dark zones and low in the "normal" LDG. TEM investigation of the dark streaks (PRATESI et al. 2002) also revealed the presence of small amorphous Fe-rich silicate spherules, within the silica-glass matrix, resulting from silicate-silicate liquid immiscibility.

Inclusions of organic substances have been found (JUX, 1983). Inclusions of sedimentary fragments (e.g. clayey drops) are not rare. That are clear proofs for it, that the glass mass in unhardened condition had contact with the unaffected sediment. That is no good proof for an impact event.


                   
Source: Jan Woreczko
                          

Inclusions of gas bubbles and a drop of dark glass.
The elongated shape of the inclusions indicates a flow of the glass during the gel state.
Source: Richard de Nul


Source: www.carionmineraux.com


Cristobalite

     
Cristobalite and dark bands

 


A plausible thesis for the origin of Libyan Desert Glass

 

Hydrovolcanic  Hypothesis (in sense FELLER, 1996)

On base of the not plausible sediment-hypothesis (in sense JUX, 1983), whereupon LDG should have emerged in a sol-gel-process at low temperatures in a lake, developed FELLER his hydrovolcanic-hypothesis.  He agrees with JUX therein, that LDG is a silica gel and not a melted glass (tektite, volcanic glass), but the origin of LDG is to be explained with hydrovolcanic processes*.
FELLER supposes, that faults have emerged in the area, which were expanded up to 4000 m under the earth's surface. On fissures sour magma penetrated at the earth's surface. In the cooling- and hardening-phase the magma were produced great quantities at water, in which the silica from the magma were accumulated.
At high concentration of SiO2 a gel-mass could develop. At lower concentrations of SiO2 resulted first a precipitation. It could ripen then the gel by water-secretion and contraction to the LDG. This theory becomes confirms by most different minerals in the LDG, similarly like them also in volcanic waters occur.

An agreement exists in expert circles to the age of the LDG. Measurements based on the fission-track method determined an age of 29 - 28 Ma (Oligocene).
The hydrovolcanic hypothesis must be specified. The process can be described as an orthomagmatic hydrotherme. There are magmatic-fluide solutions which have separated themselves from the magma body. They are concentrated on top of the pluton. The solutions can contain magmatic water, solved volcanic gases and minerals. Because of the pressure conditions is this water also with temperatures far over 100°C still liquid. Supercritical water exists at conditions above its critical temperature (374°C) and pressure (22 GPa).
For example can be also higher quantities of SiO2 in solution (first crystal growth of beta - Quartz at approx. 500°C). Other modifications of Quartz (e.g. alpha - Quartz, Lechatelerite, Tridymite, Cristobalite, which emerge in conditions of higher pressures and temperatures of up to 1500°C) and further high - temperature minerals (e.g. Baddeleyite) are entries from the plume.
  It had their root in the basaltic magma concentration in about 400-700 km depth with temperatures of about 1800°C. This Basalt source also contains molten material from the subduction zone.
During an ascent and the slow cooling of the hydrovolcanic solution it comes then normally to the remaining crystallization in veins, fractures and cavities.
The further crystallization is prevented however during a rapid cooling (for example during a quick ascent and outflow at the earth's surface).
Almost pure SiO2-rich hydrovolcanic solutions can harden consequently under loss of water to an natural glass.

*Eruptions intermediate between purely hydrothermal and purely magmatic end members and is best referred to as hydrovolcanic and/or subvolcanic eruptions. Hydrovolcanic vent breccias are variably clast to matrix supported, suggesting transport in a fluidized medium. Vent breccia fragments are angular to subrounded, depending on distance and velocity of transport and on the character of prior alteration and silicification.
On the other hand, the term hydrothermal eruption refers to an eruption, which appears to have been driven wholly by the energy contained in the geothermal reservoir.
Hydrothermal eruption products show no evidence for a direct contribution of magmatic energy.


Some remarks for new considerations and field researches
 


Fused (?) and  polished debris on the stony field

 

The origin of the LDG is up to now unsolved despite all efforts. The majority of workers favor an origin by impact. There are however some differences to "classical" impact glasses. There is also no credible references for an impact event in the region. It is also not plausible, that a mass of ~1400 tons of clean glass is produced by an impact event. It is not conceivable, that for a so great quantity of LDG an ground-reservoir of pure silicium - sand was available, which then was melted by an extraterrestrial event. Besides the Sahara not exist in the Oligocene age.
The context between the localities of LDG, age of the Desert Glass and the hydrovolcanic origin, proposed by FELLER, is it perhaps possible to solve the mystery around the LDG:

  • There is definitive no significant impact-structures in the region.

  • In contrary, in the Tertiary period is a subvolcanic and/or orthomagmatic hydrovolcanic activity in the region far spreading (Clayton Craters, crater-field Gilf Kebir, Basalts on Gilf-Kebir plateau, Basalts of Djebel Uweinat etc.).

  • The age of this basaltic magmatism has been indicated to be 28.2 to 26.7 Ma. This age is conform to the indicated age of the LDG.

  • The high plateau of the Gilf Kebir probably is flanked by old fault-lines (Bretonian event ?).

  • A such fault is marked by Quartz clumps of fissures (not documented unfortunately) and blocks by heat transformed sandstones at the eastern borderline of the northern part of Gilf Kebir as well as Quartz clumps at the eastern borderline of the southern part of Gilf Kebir (documented).

  • Probably the eastern main-fault is extended to the Jabal Zalmah (Dalma) in Libya and have then a great proximity to the "strewn field" of the LDG. Within the strewn field of Silica is an distinctive area. Here many blocks of sandstones and breccias are to be found, which were subjected a great heat (Also already by Clayton, 1932 observes).

  • To clear up the things further, BARAKAT (2001) and KLEINMANN et al. (2001) found some shocked Quartz-bearing breccias in the LDG strewn field. With it is postulates a connection to the subvolcanic and orthomagmatic hydrovolcanic structures at the Gilf Kebir and in the eastern direction of it.

 

 

 

Are the stony fields - between the western dune tracks -
 remains of a dome structure at a fault line ?
Location: 25° 20' N / 25° 36' E




Hill with fused sandstones at the probable Aqaba fault line


An adjacent hill
Positions: 23° 36' N / 25° 38' E



Detail 1



Detail 2




Further place with fused sandstones at the probable Aqaba fault line
Position: 23° 58' N / 25° 37' E



Quartz clumps, were found at the probable main fault at the eastern site
 of the southern plateau
Position: 23° 39' N / 26° 23' E


Conclusion
It is well possible, that an orthomagmatic-hydrovolcanic SiO2-rich gel have climbed the earth's surface along an older main-fault in the Tertiary period. This outflow was then hardened to Silica. These SiO2-rich hydrovolcanic solutions were hardened consequently (under loss of water) to an almost pure natural glass. Because of the fast cooling was prevented further crystallization of Quartz.
Partly digested mineral phases in the glass, the presence of high-temperature minerals of Quartz, as well as Baddeleyite, a high-temperature breakdown product of Zircon and other minerals (e.g. hexagonal Diamond with four phases of Graphite polymorphs)
are entries from a basaltic plume. It had their root in the basaltic magma concentration in about 400 - 700 km depth with temperatures of about 1800°C. This Basalt source also contains molten material from the subduction zone.
The glass flow in unhardened condition had an unaffected contact with the sediment. The glass contain organic and sedimentary remains. That is no good proof for an impact origin of Silica. The significant contents of Fe, Mg, Ni and Ir in some dark bands of Silica is no proof for the presence of a meteoric component. The trace element Iridium in the LDG is also no problem. It would originate from the melted earth's interior.

See also:
Reinhart Mazur, Austria

 

An other sample is the Dakhla Glass. The DG is a dark volcanic variant of the Libyan Desert Glass and rich of CaO and Al2O3.


What is still relevant

"The following 1/2 kg "impact glass" is a bit odd. It is not the usual translucent yellow that tektite fanciers expect to see. It is probably unlike any specimen of this type that you have ever seen."
Source: Calvin Shipbaugh


This rarely clumps of "dirty" LDG documents, that Silica was original in viscous to liquid condition. There evidently are included parts of sediments.


Crystalline microstructures in Libyan Desert Glass: Effect of microgravity environment

C. Patuelli, R. Serra, S. Coniglione, M. Chiarini
Source: Microgravity and Space Station Utilization, vol. 3, no. 4, 2002


Samples of Libyan Desert Glass were analyzed by X-ray micro-diffraction technique. It was identified fourteen nano-sized crystalline LDG phases with different colours: Coesite, tridymite, stishovite, baddeleyite, huttonite, yttrium, moissanite, platinium, polymorphs of diamond and graphite polymorphs.
The four praphite polymorh phases found in LDG samples can be explained by taking into account that the graphite came from the earlier history of the material. The element platinum is extremely scarce in most crustal rocks. The origin of platinum is from ultra-mafic igneous rocks. Its melting point is 1775 °C. The zircon oxide mineral Baddeleyite is the product of the decomposition of zircon at 1775° - 1900°C. Moissanite is a natural silicon carbide (SiC). Huttonite is a low-temperature and low-pressure Thorite-polymorph (ThSiO2).
The identification of nine highbaric phases, the presence of hexagonal diamond with four phases of graphite polymorphs, as well as huttonite and baddeleyite, confirm that LDG formed by shock metamorphism at very high pressure and temperature as a result of an impact event. The nano-sized crystalline phases revealed point out that LDG rapidly solidified.
Preliminary X-ray micro-diffractometry analyses were presented at the “Silica 96” workshop (Patuelli, 1997). High pressure and high temperature phases were identified: including samarium, germanium 12T, thorium beta (this beta phase occurs only at a temperature above 1350°C) and stishovite (!?), which is a high temperature and pressure form of SiO2.
                                                                                                                                              


Evidence for shock metamorphism in sandstones from the Libyan Desert Glass strewn field
B. Kleinmann, P. Horn and F. Langenhorst
Meteoritics & Planetary Science, vol. 36, no. 9,  2001

In five hand specimen from the LDG strewn field do not show signs of faulting or shattering or other disturbances. The samples are whitish to yellow in colour, compact and hard and present a quartz-rich fine-grained sandstone (orthoquartzite).
Although these sandstones do not seem to be shattered or otherwise disturbed, the microscopic analysis presented here reveals evidence for all degrees of shock metamorphism in the quartz grains.
The microscopic study of the five samples shows that this, mainly orthoquartzitic, sandstone is more or less brecciated.
From their textures, samples S2 and S4 are relatively similar to each other, but differ from S3 in that they show clear evidence for in situ crushing. Quartz grains exhibit conchoidal fractures, which dismember the grains into elongated splinters with extremely sharp edges (sample S2). It can be seen that this sandstone is equally very dense with a low porosity. These samples S2 and S4 are best described as a monomict breccia.
A higher degree of deformation can be observed in samples S1 and S5. In both samples, the quartz grains are mainly irregular in shape, intensely fractured and have an undulatory extinction. The matrix, in a higher proportion than in the other samples, is the product of extensive brecciation into quartz splinters and minute dust-like debris.
In both samples, distinct rhombohedral cleavages are present in quartz (S5). Furthermore, the quartz grains frequently show undulatory extinction, mosaicism and patchy isotropization (S1). Single or multiple sets of planar deformation features (PDF) are quite common in the larger quartz fragments (S1).
Neither glass phases nor high-pressure polymorphs of quartz have been detected in any of the thin sections. Some 90% of the larger quartz grains in the most affected samples (S1 and S5) showed at least one of the features.
The transmission electron microscope (TRM) was used to characterize the planar defects. Conventional bright-field and dark-field imaging and electron diffraction were performed on a field emission gun (FRG) Philips CM 20 STKM. The TEM observation focused on quartz grains in sandstone (S-1), which according to optical inspection shows the strongest shock signature. Quartz grains from this sample display various signs of shock-metamorphism; planar deformation features (PDFs), mechanical Brazil twins, and shock-fused silica glass.
The thin and straight PDFs contain numerous dislocations and some voids. The latter occur preferentially at intersections of crossing PDF sets. The PDF spacing is variable. The PDFs are predominantly oriented parallel to planes of the rhombohedral form {1011}, which is the typical PDF orientation in quartz from sedimentary rocks.
Mechanical Brazil twins occur exclusively parallel to the (0001) planes of quartz. In TEM images, they are visible as fringes that are interrupted by partial dislocations.

Remark: Further proofs for it, that subvolcanic and hydrovolcanic activities in the area of the LDG strewn field occured, like in the area eastern of the Gilf Kebir. Similar sets of PDF's in quartz grains were found also in this large crater field.

 
Ulrich Jux (1983)

Zusammensetzung und Ursprung von Wüstengläsern aus der Großen Sandsee Ägyptens.
Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften, Band 134. p. 521-553, 4 fig. , 2 tab. , 4 pl.

Summary
The chemical composition of silica glass (LDSG) from the Western Desert of Egypt (Great Sand Sea) is characterized by the high content of SiO2 (~ 98%), considerable concentrations of Al2O3 (~ 1 %) yet only small amounts of alkalies and earth alkalies (0,01-0,03 %). New analytic results confirm a rather uniform composition of all LDSG samples studied. As a rule water contents are rather high (~ 0,1 %). Most of the corraded or otherwise polished desert glass has a greenish-yellowish, slightly opalescent transparency. Except some weak reflexes of Cristobalite and Tridymite the x-ray diffraction pattern reveals an amorphous composition that lacks definite crystalline structures. There are just a few dark or light varieties with varying amounts of included Cristobalitic spheres (~ 1 mm), thus showing tendencies for ordered internal arrangements. Brownish or dark LDSG includes both saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons which are marked by a noteworthy share of isoprenoid compounds. Neogene microfossils, mainly plant tissues and sporomorphs, could be identified from macerated samples as well as in chips (artefacts!) and thin sections. From this follows a terrestrial origin of LDSG. This agrees well with other analytical results, especially of the gas extracted from bubbles in milky glass. Geologically this conclusion is confirmed by primary depositional occurrences of LDSG. With its coarse, sandy crusts, desert glass is found in fissures (desiccation cracks) of neogene, lacustrine deposits (gravel, sands, clays). The adjacent rock shows no zone of reaction, however, it coined the original sculpture of LDSG, its shape being defined by the crevices.