|
The non-impact origin of
the Libyan Desert Glass (LDG)
March 2006
Norbert Brügge, Germany
Dipl.-Geol.
last update: 22.02.2010
|

|
The
strewn field of the Libyan Desert Glass (LDG) is located in the Western Desert
of Egypt nearby the Libyan border (part of the Great Sand Sea). The area is
occupies with high parallel sand dunes, which extend from north to south direction
more as hundred kilometers in length. As centre is assumed an area, which
is expands about 20 km from W to E and about 50 km from N to S around the
position at 25° 25' N and 25° 30' E. The occurrence of silica-glass was documented
for the first time by Patrick A. Clayton in 1932.
It is supposed, that on a plain of about 6500 km2 a mass of ~1400 tons of
LDG is distributed. The most productive locations therefore are directly in
the north of Gilf Kebir plateau.The
Libyan Desert Glass (LDG) is in its chemical and physical characteristics
absolutely single and with no other natural glass comparable (volcanic glass,
tektites and impact glass). Nevertheless should be evidences for an impact
origin the presence of schlieren and partly digested mineral phases, and Lechatelierite
(a high-temperature mineral melts of quartz, however at slight pressure),
and baddeleyite, a high-temperature breakdown product of zircon (STORZER &
KOEBERL,1991). But the so characteristic inclusions of small crystals of Tridymite
and Cristobalite are missing in impact glasses. Also typical for tektite are
spherical or drops - formed aerodynamic forms.
There are however also differences between the LDG and the "classical" impact
glasses, mainly by the chemistry (KOEBERL,1994). LDG is a very silica-rich
natural glass with about 95.5 - 99 wt.% SiO2, and shows a limited variation
in major and trace element abundances. To mention are Al2O3, MgO, Na2O, K2O,
CaO, FeO and TiO2. All other elements (e.g. the group of the rare earth elements)
occur only as trace. The degree of hardness (MOHS) is 6, the specific weight
is 2.2 g/cm3, the refractive index is 1.46.
The viscosity is essentially greater than at tektites. The melting point is
with 1713° C more as 500° higher, than which other natural glasses. The Desert
Glass differs from the tektites also by higher capacity of water inclusions
(0.050 - 0.200 wt.%). The colours of the LDG's varies from light-yellow, honey-yellow,
green-yellow, milky-white to black-grey.
|
|
At the surface deposited fragments
are polished often by the wind erosion, in sediment sticking fragments have
sharp corners, are not gleaming, and sand grains are stuck. In macroscopic
examination, the glass shows no impact tracks (JUX,1983), in some fragments
are however schlieren, which point to internal movements in the material at
high temperatures.Tiny, irregularly formed bubbles, and light- and dark-brown
bands can enforce the homogeneous glassy mass. Is the concentration of bubbles
high, the Desert Glass appears milky - white and is opaque. Beside the bubbles
different kinds of further inclusions are to be recognized. To this (e.g.)
belong smallest crystal - grains of quartz similar minerals Tridymite
and Cristobalite.
|

|
Cristobalite
and Tridymite have high and low forms. Low Tridymite is orthorhombic and
pseudohexagonal, low Cristobalite is tetragonal and pseudo-cubic.
The equilibrium formation temperature of Cristobalite is 1470°C. The equilibrium
formation temperature of Tridymite is 870°C.
A Cristobalite aggregat in LDG
|
MURALI et al. 1997; ROCCHIA et al. 1996;
KOEBERL 1997 have found that the contents of siderophile elements, such as
Co, Ni and Ir, are significantly enriched in some rare, dark bands that occur
in some LDG samples. KOEBERL (1997) studied such dark bands and found that
the contents of Fe, Mg, and Ni are high in the dark zones and low in the "normal"
LDG. TEM investigation of the dark streaks (PRATESI et al. 2002) also revealed
the presence of small amorphous Fe-rich silicate spherules, within the silica-glass
matrix, resulting from silicate-silicate liquid immiscibility.
Inclusions of organic substances have been found (JUX, 1983). Inclusions
of sedimentary fragments (e.g. clayey drops) are not rare. That are clear
proofs for it, that the glass mass in unhardened condition had contact with
the unaffected sediment. That is no good proof for an impact event.
A plausible thesis for the origin of Libyan
Desert Glass
Hydrovolcanic Hypothesis (in sense FELLER, 1996)
On base of the not plausible sediment-hypothesis (in sense JUX, 1983), whereupon
LDG should have emerged in a sol-gel-process at low temperatures in a lake,
developed FELLER his hydrovolcanic-hypothesis. He agrees with JUX therein,
that LDG is a silica gel and not a melted glass (tektite, volcanic glass),
but the origin of LDG is to be explained with hydrovolcanic processes*.
FELLER supposes, that faults have emerged in the area, which were expanded
up to 4000 m under the earth's surface. On fissures sour magma penetrated
at the earth's surface. In the cooling- and hardening-phase the magma were
produced great quantities at water, in which the silica from the magma were
accumulated.
At high concentration of SiO2 a gel-mass could develop. At lower concentrations
of SiO2 resulted first a precipitation. It could ripen then the gel by water-secretion
and contraction to the LDG. This theory becomes confirms by most different
minerals in the LDG, similarly like them also in volcanic waters occur.
An agreement exists in expert
circles to the age of the LDG. Measurements based on the fission-track
method determined an age of 29 - 28 Ma (Oligocene).
The hydrovolcanic hypothesis must be specified. The process can be described
as an orthomagmatic hydrotherme. There are magmatic-fluide solutions
which have separated themselves from the magma body. They are concentrated
on top of the pluton. The solutions can contain magmatic water, solved
volcanic gases and minerals. Because of the pressure conditions is this
water also with temperatures far over 100°C still liquid. Supercritical
water exists at conditions above its critical temperature (374°C) and pressure
(22 GPa).
For example can be also higher quantities of SiO2 in solution (first crystal
growth of beta - quartz at approx. 500°C). Other modifications of quartz
(e.g. alpha - quartz, Lechatelerite, Tridymite, Cristobalite, which emerge
in conditions of higher pressures and temperatures of up to 1500°C) and
further high - temperature minerals (e.g. Baddeleyite) are entries from
the plume.
It had their root in
the basaltic magma concentration in about 400-700 km depth with temperatures
of about 1800°C. This
basalt source also contains molten material from the subduction zone.
During an ascent and the slow cooling of the hydrovolcanic solution it
comes then normally to the remaining crystallization in veins, fractures
and cavities.
The further crystallization is prevented however during a rapid cooling
(for example during a quick ascent and outflow at the earth's surface).
Almost pure SiO2-rich hydrovolcanic solutions can harden consequently under
loss of water to an natural glass. |

|
*Eruptions
intermediate between purely hydrothermal and purely magmatic end members
and is best referred to as hydrovolcanic and/or subvolcanic eruptions.
Hydrovolcanic vent breccias are variably clast to matrix supported, suggesting
transport in a fluidized medium. Vent breccia fragments are angular to
subrounded, depending on distance and velocity of transport and on the
character of prior alteration and silicification.
On the other hand, the term hydrothermal eruption refers to an eruption,
which appears to have been driven wholly by the energy contained in the
geothermal reservoir.
Hydrothermal eruption products show no evidence for a direct contribution
of magmatic energy. |
|
|
Some remarks
for new considerations and field researches
|
|




|
The origin of the LDG is up to now unsolved despite all efforts. The majority
of workers favor an origin by impact. There are however some differences to
"classical" impact glasses. There is also no credible references for an impact
event in the region. It is also not plausible, that a mass of ~1400 tons of
clean glass is produced by an impact event. It is not conceivable, that for
a so great quantity of LDG an ground-reservoir of pure silicium - sand was
available, which then was melted by an extraterrestrial event. Besides the
Sahara not exist in the Oligocene age.
The context between the localities of LDG, age of the Desert Glass and the
hydrovolcanic origin, proposed by FELLER, is it perhaps possible to solve
the mystery around the LDG:
-
There is definitive no impact-structures in the
region.
-
In contrary, in the Tertiary period is a subvolcanic and/or
orthomagmatic hydrovolcanic activity in the region far spreading (Clayton
Craters, crater-field Gilf Kebir, basalts on Gilf-Kebir plateau, basalts
of Djebel Uweinat etc.).
-
The age of this basaltic magmatism has been indicated to
be 28.2 to 26.7 Ma. This age is conform to the indicated age of the LDG.
-
The high plateau of the Gilf Kebir probably is flanked by
old fault-lines
(Bretonian event ?).
-
A such fault is marked by quartz clumps of fissures (not
documented unfortunately) and blocks by heat transformed sandstones at the
eastern borderline of the northern part of Gilf Kebir.
-
Probably the eastern main-fault is extended to the Jabal
Zalmah (Dalma) in Libya and have then a great proximity to the "strewn field"
of the LDG. Within the strewn field of Silica is an distinctive area. Here
many blocks of sandstones and breccias are to be found, which were subjected
a great heat (Also already by Clayton, 1932 observes).
-
To clear up the things further, BARAKAT (2001) and KLEINMANN
et al. (2001) found some shocked quartz-bearing breccias in the LDG strewn
field. With it is postulates a connection to the subvolcanic and orthomagmatic
hydrovolcanic structures at the Gilf Kebir and in the eastern direction of
it.


|
|
Are the stony fields - between the western dune tracks -
remains of a dome structure at the fault line ?
Location: 25° 36' E and 25° 20' N
|
|

|
|

|
Conclusion
It is well possible, that an orthomagmatic-hydrovolcanic SiO2-rich gel have
climbed the earth's surface along an older main-fault in the Tertiary period.
This outflow was then hardened to Silica. These SiO2-rich hydrovolcanic
solutions were hardened consequently (under loss of water) to an almost
pure natural glass. Because of the fast cooling was prevented further crystallization
of quartz.
Partly digested mineral phases in the glass, the presence of high-temperature
minerals of quartz, as well as Baddeleyite, a high-temperature breakdown
product of zircon and other minerals (e.g. hexagonal diamond with four phases
of graphite polymorphs) are
entries from a
basaltic plume. It
had their root in the basaltic magma concentration in about 400 - 700 km
depth with temperatures of about 1800°C. This basalt source also contains
molten material from the subduction zone.
The glass flow in unhardened condition had an unaffected contact with
the sediment. The glass contain organic and sedimentary remains. That is
no good proof for an impact origin of Silica. The significant contents of
Fe, Mg, Ni and Ir in some dark bands of Silica is no proof for the presence
of a meteoric component. The trace element Iridium in the LDG is also no
problem. It would originate from the melted earth's interior.
See also: Reinhart Mazur, Austria |
|
An other sample is the
Dakhla Glass. The DG is a dark volcanic variant
of the Libyan Desert Glass and rich of CaO and Al2O3.
|
|
|
What is still relevant

By heat transformed sandstones at the
eastern borderline of the northern part of Gilf Kebir (nearby Aqaba passage).
Position: Longitude 25° 38' E; Latitude 23° 36' N
|
|
"The following 1/2 kg "impact
glass" is a bit odd. It is not the usual translucent yellow that tektite fanciers
expect to see. It is probably unlike any specimen of this type that you have
ever seen."
Source: Calvin Shipbaugh

|

|
This rarely clumps
of "dirty" LDG documents, that Silica was original in viscous to liquid condition.
There evidently are included parts of sediments. |
|
Crystalline microstructures in Libyan Desert Glass: Effect of microgravity
environment
C. Patuelli, R. Serra, S. Coniglione, M. Chiarini
Source: Microgravity and Space Station Utilization, vol. 3, no. 4, 2002
Samples of Libyan Desert Glass were
analyzed by X-ray micro-diffraction technique. It was identified fourteen
nano-sized crystalline LDG phases with different colours: Coesite, tridymite,
stishovite, baddeleyite, huttonite, yttrium, moissanite, platinium, polymorphs
of diamond and graphite polymorphs.
The four praphite polymorh phases found in LDG samples can be explained by
taking into account that the graphite came from the earlier history of the
material. The element platinum is extremely scarce in most crustal rocks.
The origin of platinum is from ultra-mafic igneous rocks. Its melting point
is 1775 °C. The zircon oxide mineral Baddeleyite is the product of the decomposition
of zircon at 1775° - 1900°C. Moissanite is a natural silicon carbide (SiC).
Huttonite is a low-temperature and low-pressure Thorite-polymorph (ThSiO2).
The identification of nine highbaric phases, the presence of hexagonal diamond
with four phases of graphite polymorphs, as well as huttonite and baddeleyite,
confirm that LDG formed by shock metamorphism at very high pressure and temperature
as a result of an impact event. The nano-sized crystalline phases revealed
point out that LDG rapidly solidified.
Preliminary X-ray micro-diffractometry analyses were presented at the “Silica
96” workshop (Patuelli, 1997). High pressure and high temperature phases were
identified: including samarium, germanium 12T, thorium beta (this beta phase
occurs only at a temperature above 1350°C) and stishovite (!?), which is a
high temperature and pressure form of SiO2.
|
|
Evidence for shock
metamorphism in sandstones from the Libyan Desert Glass strewn field
B. Kleinmann, P. Horn and F.
Langenhorst
Meteoritics & Planetary Science,
vol. 36, no. 9, 2001
In five hand specimen from the LDG strewn field do not show signs of faulting
or shattering or other disturbances. The samples are whitish to yellow in
colour, compact and hard and present a quartz-rich fine-grained sandstone
(orthoquartzite).
Although these sandstones do not seem to be shattered or otherwise disturbed,
the microscopic analysis presented here reveals evidence for all degrees of
shock metamorphism in the quartz grains.
The microscopic study of the five samples shows that this, mainly orthoquartzitic,
sandstone is more or less brecciated.
From their textures, samples S2 and S4 are relatively similar to each other,
but differ from S3 in that they show clear evidence for in situ crushing.
Quartz grains exhibit conchoidal fractures, which dismember the grains into
elongated splinters with extremely sharp edges (sample S2). It can be seen
that this sandstone is equally very dense with a low porosity. These samples
S2 and S4 are best described as a monomict breccia.
A higher degree of deformation can be observed in samples S1 and S5. In both
samples, the quartz grains are mainly irregular in shape, intensely fractured
and have an undulatory extinction. The matrix, in a higher proportion than
in the other samples, is the product of extensive brecciation into quartz
splinters and minute dust-like debris.
In both samples, distinct rhombohedral cleavages are present in quartz (S5).
Furthermore, the quartz grains frequently show undulatory extinction, mosaicism
and patchy isotropization (S1). Single or multiple sets of planar deformation
features (PDF) are quite common in the larger quartz fragments (S1).
Neither glass phases nor high-pressure polymorphs of quartz have been detected
in any of the thin sections. Some 90% of the larger quartz grains in the most
affected samples (S1 and S5) showed at least one of the features.
The transmission electron microscope (TRM) was used to characterize the planar
defects. Conventional bright-field and dark-field imaging and electron diffraction
were performed on a field emission gun (FRG) Philips CM 20 STKM. The TEM observation
focused on quartz grains in sandstone (S-1), which according to optical inspection
shows the strongest shock signature. Quartz grains from this sample display
various signs of shock-metamorphism; planar deformation features (PDFs), mechanical
Brazil twins, and shock-fused silica glass.
The thin and straight PDFs contain numerous dislocations and some voids. The
latter occur preferentially at intersections of crossing PDF sets. The PDF
spacing is variable. The PDFs are predominantly oriented parallel to planes
of the rhombohedral form {1011}, which is the typical PDF orientation in quartz
from sedimentary rocks.
Mechanical Brazil twins occur exclusively parallel to the (0001) planes of
quartz. In TEM images, they are visible as fringes that are interrupted by
partial dislocations.
Remark: Further proofs for it,
that subvolcanic and hydrovolcanic activities in the area of the LDG strewn
field occured, like in the area eastern of the Gilf Kebir. Similar sets of
PDF's in quartz grains were found also in this large crater field.
|
|